Implausible Nature
  • Home
    • Links and Contact Page
    • Site Index
    • Site Primer >
      • Casual vs Competitive Players -- Healing the Divide
      • Laeroth's Take On Building Fluffy Armies
  • Laeroth's Blog
  • The Njesta Crusade
    • Black Templars Army Lists
    • Njesta Crusade Fluff >
      • Black Templars Background Literature
  • Black Templars 101
    • BT 101: Where to Start >
      • BT 101: Unit Analysis
      • BT 101: Building Low-Point BT Armies
      • BT 101: Commonly Used Abbreviations
    • BT 101: Building an 9th Edition List >
      • BT 101: Building A Competitive 9th Edition List
      • BT 101: Building Another Competitive 9th Edition List
    • BT 101: Assembling Your Crusade
    • BT 101: Playing With Your New Army >
      • BT 101: Tactics
      • BT 101: Duality
    • BT 101: The Conclusion
  • Painting and Modeling
    • Black Templars Gallery
    • How To Paint Black Templars

Fall of Cadia -- The BT Usable Formations

1/17/2017

3 Comments

 
Hello everyone!  Today we're going to take a look at the Fall of Cadia's new formations.  Of course, we will only analyze the ones that the Black Templars can use.  We won't really discuss the fluff from the new book here, but from all that I can tell, it looks like we got a pretty good shake in this book.  And let's face it, I've always loved the idea of pairing the Sisters of Battle with the Black Templars.  Hell, I have an army list that already does this and I will examine making use of one of these new formations going forward.  Let's take a look!
The first formation is the Wrathful Crusade.  This is the featured formation for the Black Templars in the Fall of Cadia book.  Thematically, this formation pairs the Black Templars, Saint Celestine, and Inquisitor Greyfax with her Storm Trooper platoon.  The rules are nothing special:  Crusader, Unbridled Fury, and Collective Fanaticism.  Unbridled Fury allows us to re-roll failed charge rolls and gives us Furious Charge if we have a roll of 10 or higher.  Okay, not great.  Collective Fanaticism gives us Zealot if we take the maximum allowed units in the formation.  For me, there is nothing super great about this.  It would cost 2000 or more to field this formation to the max.  Not viable in a tournament setting.  So right off the bat, you lose half of your special rules.  There are also some fairly restrictive unit selections for the Black Templars.  Specifically, the assault squad.  Assault squads are usually a liability in lists, unless they are used in a Skyhammer Annihilation formation. Their use in this formation, with the other requirements, do not add much to a list.  In addition, we are forced to take a BT Captain, which I feel is a loss since we have some good HQ special characters.  The special rules of Greyfax and Celestine are okay, but nothing that really screams to me.  Certainly nothing that makes me want to handicap myself to gain.  *shrugs*  Thematically, this formation is pretty cool.  Competitive rating?  Trash can.

The second set of new rules is the Castellans of the Imperium.  This detachment is much better than the first, though it is not featured for the Black Templars specifically.  However, there are quite a few units that the formation has access to that the specifically BT-oriented.  This list requires us to use at least two different Factions in the detachment, meaning Black Templars and one other.  It also forces us to have 2 HQ units and 4 troops minimum.  Other than that, we can take 6 of the remaining slots and/or 3 Lords of War.  So you really can take whatever you want.  The special rules are also much better than Wrathful Crusade.  Remember our old Emperor's Champion Vows?  Accept Any Challenge, No Matter the Odds?  Re-rolling failed hits in close combat?  Yep, we get it back with this formation.  Zealous Defenders gives Hatred to everyone in the detachment.  If you happen to have a lot of points to spend, you can max out the formation and gain Zealot instead of Hatred.  Great, if you are playing a billion points.  You'll usually just be rocking Hatred though.  In addition, Flock to the Front Line allows you to roll a D6 if one of your troops units is completely destroyed.  If you get 5+, you basically get a brand new unit (though in Ongoing Reserves) to bring back onto the board.  Does this mean you can get respawning dedicated transports?  RAW says yes.  So get ready to possibly respawn Land Raider Crusaders.

With that being said, do I feel this detachment screams competitive?  Possibly.  But it does take a certain list to make it effective.  First thing to note is that we have a HQ tax.  Possible to overcome?  Yes.  Will it add to the list?  Difficult to say.  However, when we take Allied Detachments...we have a HQ tax, so I'm used to that.  The great thing about this detachment for myself is that most of my lists already fulfill the basic requirements, just giving me extra rules.  We cannot rely on the FttFL special rule, however, as its only a 33% chance to respawn the unit.  What it does do, is give us a buffer if we're using MSU lists.  When you have 6 units, we're going to get 2 units back on average if they die.  This will give us a little bit of play and some additional tactical options in a game.  I personally feel that aggressive lists, despite gaining Hatred, will not get the greatest use of this list.  Why?  Because our troops are not designed to be aggressive.  Troops, nearly by definition, are objective holders.  They hold ground, not take ground and we have to take a minimum of 4 troops.

When I see this detachment, I see lists like my Defensive Drop Pod list that will gain the most benefit from it.  Hatred is definitely a huge boon to our lists, but because we have to take 4 troops in the list, we lose some flexibility with our points.  Being able to utilize the Hatred to maximum army-wide benefit will be difficult; Thus, one option is to make sure that we have an unit or two that is specifically devoted towards close combat.  Otherwise, we want to utilize the MSU approach to give it to all.  Will these units be scary close combat monsters?  No, but they are dangerous in specific situations.  And always a close combat deterrent.  However, building around the Hatred, I think is a mistake because there are other formations out there that have better special rules for killing your opponent's units.

To summarize:  Wrathful Crusade, while thematic...does not have a place in competitive Warhammer 40k.  Castellans of the Imperium, on the other hand, potentially is.  However, do not rely on either Hatred or Flock to the Front Line to win the day.  These special rules should be considered buffs to your list, not something to build around.  It is an upgrade to the Combined Arms Detachment (though lacks Objective Secured) and need to be considered as such.

Now get back to Cadia!
3 Comments
alex
2/3/2017 09:51:38 am

i have been building a black templars/ inqusition lsit for a while now the new formation would be perfect for my list but i dont know what to do with the other 2 troop choices? (i ran a black templars CAD with the land raider spearhead 2 big crusader squads and a close combat oriented squad, assult terminators, vanguard vets command squad ect with a chaplin)

would 2 big blobs be worth it what would thay achieve reading your blog a bolter blob (dont know if it would be worth it i can get objective secured units from inqusition cheaper from cotez) and a small throw away tax unit (seemed a waste) in a drop pod 2 defensive pods i relay dont know?

jsut wanted to know as i have 20 or so unbuilt crusaders and didnt know which way to go with them thanks

Reply
Crixus
2/6/2017 04:23:05 pm

Thanks for the input! Keep it coming :)

Reply
RedGhost
2/16/2017 09:25:49 am

Cheers! Thank you for the insight.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Laeroth's Blog

    This blog is devoted to the Black Templars chapter and the tactics, list building, and general musing associated with them.  Readers will see occasional posts from Marshal Laeroth.

    Check out the Implausible Nature YouTube Channel!

    Follow me on Twitter!

    Like what you see and want to help support Implausible Nature?  Click the link below and donate!

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    December 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    November 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    September 2014
    May 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009