For you guys. Enjoy!

7/2/2012

Email: "They said that they are for sure intended to use the new rules from
the 6th ed book and the lack of that in the faq was an oversight on
their part due to the speed at which all the faq's had to be put out.

So typhoons are back!"

4 Comments

Nathan

7/2/2012 11:45:15 am

Wow, whoever sent you that email seems like a really great guy!

Marshal Laeroth (Admin) link

7/3/2012 11:22:28 am

Maybe if more people like you sent emails about TRULY bad stuff (not about me having access to future rules... *cough*), then they might listen more. As it is, me sending emails and calling them gets me exactly squat. lol.

So props to you. :)

Th!rdeye

7/5/2012 01:57:32 pm

If they did infact rush to get these FAQs out then could they be working on a more extensive FAQ/Errata update for all the armies?

It would make sense as no army can take Flakk missles and have limited Flyer defense. It looks like they just adjusted wordings and some rules to fit with 6th wordings, and limit "wait...wut" happenings with people.

Some stuff is newly balanced, but stuff seems too sloppy to be a real Errata correction. I feel like they knew PE was nerfed kinda hard, and just threw Rage in because "it fits close enough".

If they honestly were going to correct things to help armies in 6th we would have gotten Kraks and Frags, and other little fixes.

So either a better FAQ is coming or our maybe our Codex is closer than we think for them to be so sloppy as a hold-them-over fix....

More than likely the former.

Stormsblade

7/8/2012 04:18:29 am

Annoys me to no end that they know there is a mistake and dont spend the 2 minutes to edit the document to fix it...

For you guys. Enjoy!

Leave a Reply.

Laeroth's Blog

Archives